Placeholder image

Conferment/Delegation of Powers

Sr.No Title
1 142 US 649 (1892)
2 276 US 394 (1928)
3 AIR 170 Supreme Court 192
4 P L D 1975 Supreme Court 50
5 P L D 1963 Supreme Court 251
6 2005 P T D 2286
7 1993 S C M R 1905
8 If legislature has amended the law then prior judgment will not hold good (Prohibition or constraint then law is set to be validly enacted)
9 PLD 1999 SC 1026
10 Changed in 18(3) from Federal Government to Minister in Charge for Finance, power of legislature (List of SROs of Export Policy Section imposing/rescinding RD PLD 1999 SC 1026)
11 What are the principles which courts should look into in a delegation case (Senate Standing Committee regulatory holds meeting to review & watch progress and justification)
12 What are the principles which courts should look into in a delegation case (Continuous monitoring by Standing Committee of the Senate of Pakistan)
13 What are the principles which courts should look into in a delegation case (Approval of the Cabinet)
14 What are the principles which courts should look into in a delegation case; (Parliamentary control over delegation(Explain presentation before ECC of the Cabinet)
15 Levy of , Exemption from, and Repayment of Customs-Duties (Only non essential functions to be delegated)
16 What are the principles which courts should look into in a delegation case; (Need for delegation)
17 This decision has been consistently followed by Supreme Court, meaning thereby endorsing the delegation of powers by the legislature in following cases (Advance telecom & others vs FOP CP No. 1812-1815, 1962-1970 SC)
18 Delegation of power by Legislature & Scope and validity of Regulatory Duty is a "decided issue" (1999 S C M R 412)
19 Delegation of power by Legislature & Scope and validity of Regulatory Duty is a "decided issue" (PLD 1988 SC 670)
20 Synopsis of Mustafa Impex
21 Judgment of Mustafa Impex (Mustafa Impex, Karachi vs. Government of Pakistan)
Copyright © . All rights reserved. Federal Board of Revenue Govt of Pakistan.